feat: Add api, fuzzer and mapper for TagsTagBinding - #5416
Conversation
|
issue #5299 |
|
/assign @justinsb |
| return obj.Spec.ParentRef.External, nil | ||
| } | ||
| if obj.Spec.ParentRef.Name != "" { | ||
| // TODO: This is not quite right, we need to resolve the project number. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have been calling common.NormalizeRefs first (and then we can treat External == "" as an error)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah - a meta point - this is why it's problematic to introduce identity & reference here. AFAICT this code is currently unused and therefore untested?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right, it is unused and untested. It would be changed in the next PR (controller)
| // If the "External" is given in the other resource's spec.TagsTagValueRef, the given value will be used. | ||
| // Otherwise, the "Name" and "Namespace" will be used to query the actual TagsTagValue object from the cluster. | ||
| func (r *TagsTagValueRef) NormalizedExternal(ctx context.Context, reader client.Reader, otherNamespace string) (string, error) { | ||
| if r.External != "" && r.Name != "" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we use the common function?
justinsb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CRD changes (or lack of changes!) look good
Identity/Reference code looks more problematic, and is not tested in this PR. Split into another PR. Or maybe we can find a way to test it now, if you really want to do it in this PR.
I want to merge this PR and have the code template fixed in a separate PR, and have this identity/reference fixed in the next controller PR. Theoretically the identity and reference in this PR shows that they come from the right place: generate.sh if the file does not exist., which uses the code template. |
Removed the identity and reference files from this PR. |
|
issue #5487 |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
5b5158e
into
GoogleCloudPlatform:master
BRIEF Change description
Fixes #
WHY do we need this change?
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR add something which needs to be 'release noted'?
Additional documentation e.g., references, usage docs, etc.:
Intended Milestone
Please indicate the intended milestone.
Tests you have done
make ready-prto ensure this PR is ready for review.